When trying to explain to people who can't absorb this I tell them it's like an art gallery security system with laser beams everywhere as a security system ...Try to get around them without it touching you...That's exactly what we live in and walk thru EVERYDAY
I also have what I call a permanent cloud southeast of my house. It is there most everyday and most all of the time. Today they have just now laid down a couple chemtrails.
Good info. may God continue to richly bless this work, we need to know how to detox and we all need to be detoxing because the Lord will make our spirit strong, but our body must stay strong also thank you so much for sharing and educating us
last year we had 'snow' that came down in teeny balls instead of flakes. even with temperatures above 40° for a couple of days and it still did not melt as snow would normally melt. I saved a bit of it to see if it would grow anything. I don't see anything moving in it. it probably had a bit of organics in it. it has a few green algae appearing fibers that have grown. it is interesting.
Great interview! I'm just beginning to listen and felt to share this 👉 Back in 2005, living in Sedona, Arizona, when our skies were being hit by LINES IN THE SKY, as it was becoming known ~ I noticed white stringy filaments, almost web-like on my bushes in the garden? It was happening everywhere after the planes criss crossed our pretty blues only to see these white filament things floating down. Very strange and an uncomfortable feeling came over me seeing it.
I put some in a baggie, using gloves, thinking to have it analyzed but never did. Sigh.
I don't have a doom and gloom attitude either Chris .. I have a 'I wanna know' no matter what it is attitude, let the truth be TOLD.
"Love is our sword,
focus is our strength,
knowledge is the best weapon in our arsenal." ~ plr
DR. BILL DEAGLE WHO TREATED THE CHEMTRAIL PILOTS, WAS KILLED FOR WHAT HE DID OR COULD EXPOSE ABOUT THE CHEMTRAILS.
He exposed things that are in the chemtrails - aluminum, BARIUM, strontium, bacteria, viruses, fluoride, plasma, the Morgellens in some cases and other things.
No, that question is entirely too basic. When he mentioned space in the Hubble telescope, he said they use a specific telescope that isn’t really a telescope it’s a large camera to observe things they (obviously) can’t go to. It’s right there he’s deflecting from the concept of a telescope as we know it to begin with.
Saturn — whether it’s a planet far far away (which no one believes) or a refraction of sentient energy or an interdimensional hard drive, it’s still a celestial body that many folk point a camera at a take a pic. Amateurs and pros alike can see the perceived “rings”. All he’s saying is that the machine he has (which isn’t even new) uses the same tech that NASA is claiming the Hubble is using to see what it’s seeing. Honestly that’s not the lie part — I think it IS seeing what it’s seeing — the lie is that it’s a ball of gas a billion lightyears away. But don’t let that one lie that isn’t the technology part, cloud your judgement about the technology party.
Space is a concept not a place people can travel to. Allow people to just talk using common terms without jumping to unnecessary conclusions. I say unnecessary because no matter what he or me (the guy interviewing Dr Spencer) think about space, it doesn’t change a damn thing about what’s actually in the snow and what the machine is finding
Any sane, rational person should be able to work out that we don't - and can't - know what the composition of things hundreds of millions or billions of miles away is. Yet they continue to make shit up and get away with it. It's all just speculative nonsense based on junk science.
Giving it any credence is, in my opinion, a mistake. And when people refer to it, they should qualify what they say. It's tedious, but should still be done.
I think you’re couching the nasa lie wrong. I presume we’re on the same page that basically all of what nasa releases is misdirection — but please tell me you understand that they are doing *something* there every day other than sticking their thumb up their butt ever since the “moon landing”.
What they do is real. What they tell us they do is false. The machines they use are actually measuring something but the goal is to better manipulate the world we live in and the people who live in… not to understand life far away.
So if, for example, NASA give us a great breakdown on all the findings of the contents of the Mars sample, or Saturn, and they claim it’s all billions of miles away…. What if the only lie is the distance.? What if their observations are reflective of earth base element because what they’re really scanning is a celestial reflection of some aspect of earth — and so while it’s not 80 Bajillion miles away, its a real thing we’re seeing and a real thing (whatever the composition) they’re measuring.
Pretending like just because they’re lying about large concepts, therefore everyone who works in the institution is just using crayons and popcorn tools at work every day is not really thinking it thru. NASA is about taking control of the mind and the “space between” them ears — and yes, they use Hubble tech (proabbly pointed at earth more than Saturn) to determine the composition of things. Please understand this is all he’s trying to say in this discussion
No, actually, not everyone needs to qualify everything they’re saying based on the perceived short-attn span blind spot of someone else who might be watching. He’s allowed to reference a thing in order to make another thing make sense. And in case you didn’t realize, your questions are hella loaded, with plenty of implication behind them.
Is anyone claiming the Hubble telescope is “in space” ? No. It’s on a platform like a tripod like every other astronomy based camera. It’s not a convo about space or the Hubble or anything related OTHER THAN that advanced physics cameras are used to make composition determinations — and you wanna get hung up on the idea that because NASA pushes junk science, therefore the machine sitting on his desk isn’t a real machine? Or isn’t an ELF spectroscopy scanner that can analyze matter?
Zoom out. No one has to qualify their background about some unrelated point just to make a separate point land… especially when it’s loaded, off-topic subject matter.
I don’t actually believe that “outer space” is a physical travelable place like the NASA model we’ve been given. But I know we have hi altitude platforms and what they call LEO satellite technology doing shit, and then a whole department that exists as a misdirection for what’s really going on. Also… “Space” is still applicable for the zone between the ground and the upper boundary, which has a whole lot going on.
So because I can hold two concepts at once, I don’t need for him to pre-debunk the nasa model before I can understand the concept of a fancy camera that’s taking imagery beyond what we’re made to think is possible. I also know he’s got the real machine and the one in his home isn’t “junk science” it’s stuff NASA is using for doing what they do, just so they can lie to us all about what they’re finding and where. It’s also used by plenty of companies unrelated to NASA so I wouldn’t get hung up on such a short aside that doesn’t reflect the full understanding of anyone on screen. It was just a quick reference to something familiar - attempting to make an unfamiliar new technology, more relatable.
It also changes nothing about the contents of the snow or the ability of the machine
Fair enough. But why use NASA's space telescope as an example and not one of the many more down-to-Earth (mundane?) applications that you cite - whatever they may be? (Maybe you could enlighten me. I've never heard of it before).
His implication is: "NASA use it, therefore it's bloody awesome". He's leaning on NASA as being the arbiters of what this technology can or can't do.
"But ye are forgers of lies, ye are all physicians of no value. O that ye would altogether hold your peace! and it should be your wisdom." (Job 13:4-5)
“Dr.” Wil Spencer is not an authority on what is in the injections. This is to create a false equivalence between the sorcery of pharmakeia and everything else, which these interest groups have been doing from the beginning.
Use the Word of God or you will continue to fall to deception.
Yes. He mentioned statements about the injections, so just following up on that because someone shared the video with me and wanted to know if the same mRNA is now in the snow.
But otherwise, thank you for exposing false narratives on your channel.
Sure thing D Booma San. Thank you for sharing the early video to warn folks about A.I. overtaking host bodies. My main points are to warn folks of A.I. Assimilation according to the Book of Job, the LIVE Metaverse economy, the tokens & mining operations happening in the body, the violence and murders (especially against children), and measurable indicators.
1) you sound a bit triggered based on things you’ve assumed about me / him.
2) who said anything about him being an “authority” on the injections? You aren’t any authority on it so why should we listen to you? Can’t a person just be a person without being an authority or a liar?
3) maybe you fail to realize how he got these readings in the snow or the injections, but it’s not opinion here. It’s a spectroscopy machine designed to export whatever frequencies are present in any sample. Same machine will tell you what’s in the injections and it doesn’t require “belief”. I’ve seen the results first hand. I’d like you to send over your own personal test results (since you surely can’t be replying on the hearsay of strangers online) of the samples you’ve tested to prove him wrong. He owns the radionics spectroscopy scanner and wrote custom software for it — have you? If you haven’t personally scanned these vaccine vials yourself then you really have no say on what’s truly in them at all then do you?
The only one here making any false equivalency is you. mRNA is a ribbon of peptides in acid. It’s naturally occurring in nature and biological systems, and then there’s also the synthetic kind. Each carries its own unique frequency, and machines are great at telling you what’s in what.
You’re making the false equivalency that because *some internet groups* (whatever that means) have been “doing this from the beginning” — whenever that was — that therefore this guys motive is to confuse people over what is pharmakeia and what isn’t. It’s a silly argument when you know ZERO about this dude.
What we’re explaining here is the intersection of pharmakeia and functional computer science using organic bodies which require pharmakeia to work. No one is conflating the two. One relies on the other. It’s disingenuous of you to suggest they ARENT connected, it just shows how you don’t fully understand the world around you, or how its systems work.
I don’t think it’s a bad idea to lean on the word of God. But using it in this out-of-context, weaponized passive aggressive way, makes people repulsed by it, not in favor of it. Use appropriate context where it applies.
This video was about snow content. *some of* the ingredients in the snow are also in the jabs. Patents show this…. but so does a spectroscopy machine and you don’t need to be any “authority” on anything to read numbers. The mRNA in the jabs is a component in a PLATFORM (like an operating system) and the Moderna CEO said this himself. That same OS is being used in the wider iOB and DODIN system, which does include weather control, and requires the same ribonucleaic acid to affect organic plants and other atmospheric molecules to do what it does — so I really don’t understand the logic behind anything you said.
Pharmakeia sorcery is real. But so are manipulating weather systems and they use the same manipulation materials for both. No one’s making a FALSE equivalency here, quite the contrary.
For you to use an out of context Bible verse to assert someone is LYING when really it’s you that doesn’t know how the system works, is petty and unbecoming of any adult, especially a Christian. Wil Spencer nor I am lying about anything we said here… but I do think there’s verses about bearing false witness against someone — I could reference that one for you if you’d like? Your whole comment is a triggered opinion of false witness against someone you don’t personally know, using the Bible to support your point. Not a good look.
Hi!! I am hoping to speak with you in privacy about a substance I found in my blood sample. After watching your interview with Dr.Spencer and his equipment that can detect frequencies from pictures/video it got me hoping he could identify the weird substance in my blood. Anyway, I just said what I wanted private but wh add ya gonna do?
When trying to explain to people who can't absorb this I tell them it's like an art gallery security system with laser beams everywhere as a security system ...Try to get around them without it touching you...That's exactly what we live in and walk thru EVERYDAY
I also have what I call a permanent cloud southeast of my house. It is there most everyday and most all of the time. Today they have just now laid down a couple chemtrails.
Good info. may God continue to richly bless this work, we need to know how to detox and we all need to be detoxing because the Lord will make our spirit strong, but our body must stay strong also thank you so much for sharing and educating us
Dane Wigington
Geoengineeringwatch.org
Love you all Booma ! 💯 Ty for rocking it out for humanity ! 🛡️🪽⚔️
Thanks, Nicholas!
last year we had 'snow' that came down in teeny balls instead of flakes. even with temperatures above 40° for a couple of days and it still did not melt as snow would normally melt. I saved a bit of it to see if it would grow anything. I don't see anything moving in it. it probably had a bit of organics in it. it has a few green algae appearing fibers that have grown. it is interesting.
https://substack.com/@lawofuno/note/c-213593543?r=5ods0m&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
https://substack.com/@lawofuno/note/c-213593543?r=5ods0m&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
Thank you !
Great interview! I'm just beginning to listen and felt to share this 👉 Back in 2005, living in Sedona, Arizona, when our skies were being hit by LINES IN THE SKY, as it was becoming known ~ I noticed white stringy filaments, almost web-like on my bushes in the garden? It was happening everywhere after the planes criss crossed our pretty blues only to see these white filament things floating down. Very strange and an uncomfortable feeling came over me seeing it.
I put some in a baggie, using gloves, thinking to have it analyzed but never did. Sigh.
I don't have a doom and gloom attitude either Chris .. I have a 'I wanna know' no matter what it is attitude, let the truth be TOLD.
"Love is our sword,
focus is our strength,
knowledge is the best weapon in our arsenal." ~ plr
There's nothing new Under the Sun
DR. BILL DEAGLE WHO TREATED THE CHEMTRAIL PILOTS, WAS KILLED FOR WHAT HE DID OR COULD EXPOSE ABOUT THE CHEMTRAILS.
He exposed things that are in the chemtrails - aluminum, BARIUM, strontium, bacteria, viruses, fluoride, plasma, the Morgellens in some cases and other things.
he believes in outer space? and telescopes in space?
No, that question is entirely too basic. When he mentioned space in the Hubble telescope, he said they use a specific telescope that isn’t really a telescope it’s a large camera to observe things they (obviously) can’t go to. It’s right there he’s deflecting from the concept of a telescope as we know it to begin with.
Saturn — whether it’s a planet far far away (which no one believes) or a refraction of sentient energy or an interdimensional hard drive, it’s still a celestial body that many folk point a camera at a take a pic. Amateurs and pros alike can see the perceived “rings”. All he’s saying is that the machine he has (which isn’t even new) uses the same tech that NASA is claiming the Hubble is using to see what it’s seeing. Honestly that’s not the lie part — I think it IS seeing what it’s seeing — the lie is that it’s a ball of gas a billion lightyears away. But don’t let that one lie that isn’t the technology part, cloud your judgement about the technology party.
Space is a concept not a place people can travel to. Allow people to just talk using common terms without jumping to unnecessary conclusions. I say unnecessary because no matter what he or me (the guy interviewing Dr Spencer) think about space, it doesn’t change a damn thing about what’s actually in the snow and what the machine is finding
Any sane, rational person should be able to work out that we don't - and can't - know what the composition of things hundreds of millions or billions of miles away is. Yet they continue to make shit up and get away with it. It's all just speculative nonsense based on junk science.
Giving it any credence is, in my opinion, a mistake. And when people refer to it, they should qualify what they say. It's tedious, but should still be done.
I think you’re couching the nasa lie wrong. I presume we’re on the same page that basically all of what nasa releases is misdirection — but please tell me you understand that they are doing *something* there every day other than sticking their thumb up their butt ever since the “moon landing”.
What they do is real. What they tell us they do is false. The machines they use are actually measuring something but the goal is to better manipulate the world we live in and the people who live in… not to understand life far away.
So if, for example, NASA give us a great breakdown on all the findings of the contents of the Mars sample, or Saturn, and they claim it’s all billions of miles away…. What if the only lie is the distance.? What if their observations are reflective of earth base element because what they’re really scanning is a celestial reflection of some aspect of earth — and so while it’s not 80 Bajillion miles away, its a real thing we’re seeing and a real thing (whatever the composition) they’re measuring.
Pretending like just because they’re lying about large concepts, therefore everyone who works in the institution is just using crayons and popcorn tools at work every day is not really thinking it thru. NASA is about taking control of the mind and the “space between” them ears — and yes, they use Hubble tech (proabbly pointed at earth more than Saturn) to determine the composition of things. Please understand this is all he’s trying to say in this discussion
No, actually, not everyone needs to qualify everything they’re saying based on the perceived short-attn span blind spot of someone else who might be watching. He’s allowed to reference a thing in order to make another thing make sense. And in case you didn’t realize, your questions are hella loaded, with plenty of implication behind them.
Is anyone claiming the Hubble telescope is “in space” ? No. It’s on a platform like a tripod like every other astronomy based camera. It’s not a convo about space or the Hubble or anything related OTHER THAN that advanced physics cameras are used to make composition determinations — and you wanna get hung up on the idea that because NASA pushes junk science, therefore the machine sitting on his desk isn’t a real machine? Or isn’t an ELF spectroscopy scanner that can analyze matter?
Zoom out. No one has to qualify their background about some unrelated point just to make a separate point land… especially when it’s loaded, off-topic subject matter.
I don’t actually believe that “outer space” is a physical travelable place like the NASA model we’ve been given. But I know we have hi altitude platforms and what they call LEO satellite technology doing shit, and then a whole department that exists as a misdirection for what’s really going on. Also… “Space” is still applicable for the zone between the ground and the upper boundary, which has a whole lot going on.
So because I can hold two concepts at once, I don’t need for him to pre-debunk the nasa model before I can understand the concept of a fancy camera that’s taking imagery beyond what we’re made to think is possible. I also know he’s got the real machine and the one in his home isn’t “junk science” it’s stuff NASA is using for doing what they do, just so they can lie to us all about what they’re finding and where. It’s also used by plenty of companies unrelated to NASA so I wouldn’t get hung up on such a short aside that doesn’t reflect the full understanding of anyone on screen. It was just a quick reference to something familiar - attempting to make an unfamiliar new technology, more relatable.
It also changes nothing about the contents of the snow or the ability of the machine
Fair enough. But why use NASA's space telescope as an example and not one of the many more down-to-Earth (mundane?) applications that you cite - whatever they may be? (Maybe you could enlighten me. I've never heard of it before).
His implication is: "NASA use it, therefore it's bloody awesome". He's leaning on NASA as being the arbiters of what this technology can or can't do.
It was 2 questions. And they were just questions.
Cameras in space then?
"But ye are forgers of lies, ye are all physicians of no value. O that ye would altogether hold your peace! and it should be your wisdom." (Job 13:4-5)
“Dr.” Wil Spencer is not an authority on what is in the injections. This is to create a false equivalence between the sorcery of pharmakeia and everything else, which these interest groups have been doing from the beginning.
Use the Word of God or you will continue to fall to deception.
This is about what is in the snow… 🤨
Yes. He mentioned statements about the injections, so just following up on that because someone shared the video with me and wanted to know if the same mRNA is now in the snow.
But otherwise, thank you for exposing false narratives on your channel.
Who do you deem an authority on what is in the injections?
Book of Job only.
You and your name are familiar. I think I shared an interview of yours once upon a time. You do interviews?
Sure thing D Booma San. Thank you for sharing the early video to warn folks about A.I. overtaking host bodies. My main points are to warn folks of A.I. Assimilation according to the Book of Job, the LIVE Metaverse economy, the tokens & mining operations happening in the body, the violence and murders (especially against children), and measurable indicators.
I released a (1) page illustration that summarizes everything: https://open.substack.com/pub/bibledecode/p/shot-by-god-illustration?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
I’m the guy interviewing in this video.
1) you sound a bit triggered based on things you’ve assumed about me / him.
2) who said anything about him being an “authority” on the injections? You aren’t any authority on it so why should we listen to you? Can’t a person just be a person without being an authority or a liar?
3) maybe you fail to realize how he got these readings in the snow or the injections, but it’s not opinion here. It’s a spectroscopy machine designed to export whatever frequencies are present in any sample. Same machine will tell you what’s in the injections and it doesn’t require “belief”. I’ve seen the results first hand. I’d like you to send over your own personal test results (since you surely can’t be replying on the hearsay of strangers online) of the samples you’ve tested to prove him wrong. He owns the radionics spectroscopy scanner and wrote custom software for it — have you? If you haven’t personally scanned these vaccine vials yourself then you really have no say on what’s truly in them at all then do you?
The only one here making any false equivalency is you. mRNA is a ribbon of peptides in acid. It’s naturally occurring in nature and biological systems, and then there’s also the synthetic kind. Each carries its own unique frequency, and machines are great at telling you what’s in what.
You’re making the false equivalency that because *some internet groups* (whatever that means) have been “doing this from the beginning” — whenever that was — that therefore this guys motive is to confuse people over what is pharmakeia and what isn’t. It’s a silly argument when you know ZERO about this dude.
What we’re explaining here is the intersection of pharmakeia and functional computer science using organic bodies which require pharmakeia to work. No one is conflating the two. One relies on the other. It’s disingenuous of you to suggest they ARENT connected, it just shows how you don’t fully understand the world around you, or how its systems work.
I don’t think it’s a bad idea to lean on the word of God. But using it in this out-of-context, weaponized passive aggressive way, makes people repulsed by it, not in favor of it. Use appropriate context where it applies.
This video was about snow content. *some of* the ingredients in the snow are also in the jabs. Patents show this…. but so does a spectroscopy machine and you don’t need to be any “authority” on anything to read numbers. The mRNA in the jabs is a component in a PLATFORM (like an operating system) and the Moderna CEO said this himself. That same OS is being used in the wider iOB and DODIN system, which does include weather control, and requires the same ribonucleaic acid to affect organic plants and other atmospheric molecules to do what it does — so I really don’t understand the logic behind anything you said.
Pharmakeia sorcery is real. But so are manipulating weather systems and they use the same manipulation materials for both. No one’s making a FALSE equivalency here, quite the contrary.
For you to use an out of context Bible verse to assert someone is LYING when really it’s you that doesn’t know how the system works, is petty and unbecoming of any adult, especially a Christian. Wil Spencer nor I am lying about anything we said here… but I do think there’s verses about bearing false witness against someone — I could reference that one for you if you’d like? Your whole comment is a triggered opinion of false witness against someone you don’t personally know, using the Bible to support your point. Not a good look.
Hi!! I am hoping to speak with you in privacy about a substance I found in my blood sample. After watching your interview with Dr.Spencer and his equipment that can detect frequencies from pictures/video it got me hoping he could identify the weird substance in my blood. Anyway, I just said what I wanted private but wh add ya gonna do?
TYI!!